Welcome to HurstInjuryLaw.com, the personal blog of William W. Hurst, Attorney at Law in Indianapolis. This is where Bill will post his research notes, case studies, and legal news for public viewing. Feel free to browse the site and use any content you find for your own blogs so long as you properly cite our site. For information on Bill's legal practice, please visit his business website at BillHurst.com.

Archive for March, 2011


You are driving down the street and hear a siren.  You look around for the flashing red lights and suddenly you see an ambulance, firetruck or police vehicle approaching. What do you do?

Indiana Code 9-21-8-35 says the following:

Upon the immediate approach of an authorized emergency vehicles, when the person who drives the authorized emergency vehicle is giving audible signal by siren or displaying alternately flashing red, red and white, or red and blue lights,  a person who drives another vehicle shall do the following unless otherwise directed by a law enforcement officer:

(1) Yield the right-of-way.

(2) Immediately drive to a position parallel to an as close as possible to the right-hand edge or curb to the highway clear of any intersection

(3) Stop and remain in position until the authorized emergency vehicle has passed.

  IC 9-21-17-20 also requires a pedestrian to yield to the right-of-way to the emergency vehicle.  while the emergency vehicle has to operate with regard to the safety of persons driving in the vicinity, you have a statutory obligation to pull over and stop if it can be safely done.

Incidents involving emergency vehicles in Indiana, which are involved in personal injury are often difficult to pursue by the injured person.  These accidents are governed by the Indiana Tort Claims Act which requires a statutory certified notice to be sent to the State and other governmental entities involved in the claim on thoughts to have caused the accident.  This must be done within a specified amount of time (usually 180 days) or the injured person may not be able to make a claim arising out of an accident where the victim believes that the emergency vehicle operator was negligent.  Failure to follow the statutory requirements may cause the claim to fail and be forever barred.

There are governmental immunity laws in Indiana for accident cases involving state or government defendants in lawsuits.  It is much more difficult to successfully sue the governmental entity for what you believe was negligent operation of an emergency vehicle.  Withouth question, a person making such a claim should hire an experienced personal injury attorney to “shepherd” them through these somewhat difficult claims and litigation requirements.

There have been a number of lawsuits in the State of Indiana involving emergency vehicles and the very serious injuries which result from the often high speeds involved in the collisions.  The number of Indiana fatalities occurred involving emergency vehicles have been recorded in recent times.  An EMS worker was killed in a southern Indiana ambulance crash in Clark County in December of 2010 where the driver of the ambulance failed to make the curve on Highway I-60.  He left the road, striking a tree and killing the driver.  The ambulance crashed within two miles of its destination.  A few days later, a automobile crash killed a driver in Clarksville, Indiana when her vehicle was hit by an ambulance going 60 mph on an emergency run.  These accidents are all to common and generally involve serious injuries due to the speed involved. http://www.wave3.com/story/13639530/ems-worker-dies-in-southern-indiana-ambulance-crash?redirected=true

     Its noteworthy that the occupants of the emergency vehicles are at risk for serious injuries.  During a period from 1999 to 2009, police cruisers in the State of Indiana were involved in 166 collisions, resulting in death of 2 troopers and injures to many other operators of vehicles involved.  These collisions often occurred when officers were making traffic stops or working crash sites.  The Indiana Police Data shows that in 2010, a similar number of police cruisers have been struck in the State of Indiana.  this problem does not just occur in Indiana, but throughout the world.  An Austrailian study notes that ambulance providers are at a 50% greater risk being involved in a crash while on duty then when driving a private automobile.  (This study indicates there is fatality per 100 accidents. http://www.emergalert.com.au/Pages/Case%20Studies/index.html     

 It is noted that about 20 % of all firefighter deaths are not related to fire fighting, but occur due to vehicle-related incidents.  According to the FBI statistics between 1995 and 2006, an average of 1 U.S. law enforcement officer was struck and killed each month by a passing vehicle.  More law inforcement officers are killed this way than in shootings. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5516a3.htm

If you or a love one are have been involved in an accident involving  an emergency vehicle and you would like to have a consultation with an experienced attorney, contact William W. Hurst.

 

 

If you’ve been hurt in an accident where someone is at fault, his/her insurance company does not want you to hire a lawyer.  It is because the insurance adjuster knows he/she will have to pay larger “fairer” insurance settlement amounts to resolve the personal injury accident case.  The Insurance Research Council found that insurance settlements were 4.8 times higher for injured victims in accidents when represented by personal injury lawyers.  (Insurance Research Council 1999 study) www.ircweb.org/ and after payment of attorney fees the injured person receives 3.28 times more than the person who does not have a lawyer.

The Insurance Research Council found that insurance injury claims arising out of accidents where the plaintiffs were represented by attorneys represented only 40% off all claimants, yet they received 79% of all money paid out for liability insurance settlements.  These statistics show that having a personal injury attorney on your side when you’ve been injured in an accident greatly increases your chance of receiving fair compensation for your injury [Interestingly the Insurance Research Council is funded by insurance companies www.alcpcu.org/irc/.

For an interesting investigatory CNN article which chronicles the strategies that the insurance companies use to minimize their payments for injury cases, see “insurance companies fight paying claims” (Anderson Cooper 360 blog) at www.CNN.com.  An investigation by CNN revealed that 10 out of the top 12 auto insurance companies are putting injured claimants in a financial bind forcing them to settle for sums of money which are not fair.  The example given by CNN was of a case where a woman was in a minor auto accident which was not her fault.  Her medical bills and loss wages totaled $25,000 and Allstate who insured the wrongdoer offered $15,000.  This person could try to find a personal injury lawyer, but was worried about whether she could find an injury lawyer who was willing to take on her case and what she receive after cost of expenses of hiring an attorney.  This was the  final mindset that Allstate and a number of other major carriers in America are currently pursuing to create an environment to minimized their payments to settle injury claims.

If you are in a minor impact/crash, get hurt and do not have a very substantial injury or claim it is likely that the insurance carrier will do the same thing to you.  The insurance company will delay handling your claim, deny you were hurt to the extent that you actually are, and defend their decision in a drawn out court battle.  It is what they call their 3 D’s; Delay, Deny and Defend.” With no where for the injured victim to go, Allstate and other insurance carriers “bet you’ll take what they offer and walk away”.  Apparently this is the procedure set forth in the insurance companies training manuals, which CNN obtained.  They call them “smaller walk away settlements”.  Insurance carriers are betting you won’t wait, you won’t sue and you’ll take what you can get and “walk away.”  Apparently accident victims have been “walking away” from billions of dollars that the insurance companies now keep for themselves.  Unless you are willing to forgo being treated fairly, you must hire a personal injury lawyer who is experienced and knowledgeable about these insurance tactics.  If you have been injured in an accident and are having problems with he insurance company claims adjuster, contact William W. Hurst, a lawyer experienced in dealing with insurance companies for a free consultation and case evaluation.

Best Lawyers in America is the oldest and most respected peer-review publication in the legal profession.  Best Lawyers compiles lists of outstanding attorneys by conducting exhaustive peer-review surveys in which thousands of leading lawyers confidentially evaluate their professional peers.  In the U.S., Best Lawyers publishes an annual referral guide, The Best Lawyers in America, which includes 41,419 attorneys in 126 practice areas, covering all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

The current, 17th edition of  The Best Lawyers in America (2011), is based on more than 3.1 million detailed evaluations of lawyers by other lawyers.

Because lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be included, a listing in BEST LAWYERS is widely regarded within the legal profession as a singular honor, conferred on a lawyer by his or her peers.  For more than 25 years, Best Lawyers lists have earned the respect of the profession, the media, and the public as the most reliable, unbiased source of legal referral anywhere.

It is important to note that the lawyers listed in Best Lawyers have no say in deciding which practice areas they are included in.  They are voted into practice areas entirely as a result of the votes they receive from their peers.  The sub-specialties listed after their names are based on information from a variety of sources.

Lawyers are nominated to BEST LAWYERS in three ways.  First, all of the lawyers in the previous edition of Best Lawyers are not automatically nominated into the next edition.  Second, during the voting process, voting lawyers are asked to nominate any outstanding lawyers who have not yet been nominated.  These Best Lawyer nominations are generally for lawyers at other firms and register as votes as well as nominations.  There are several categories including personal injury lawyers; those who represent the plaintiffs and those who represent defendants.  If you are looking for a personal injury lawyer and select one of these lawyers, you can be sure that the lawyer is in good standing and has the confidence of the legal community.

As soon as the selections are finalized, the selected Best Lawyers are checked against state bar association sanction lists to make sure that every lawyer is in good standing with the ethics committee of his or her state bar.  Then letters of congratulation are sent to all the listed lawyers.  At the same time, marketing directors receive summaries of the survey results for their firms, including lists of returning listees, new listees, and quantitative information comparing the firm’s survey results to those of other firms in the city, state, region, or nation.

For more information see www.bestlawyers.com.  For a lawyer who has been listed as a Best Lawyer in area  personal injury Indiana, see www.billhurst.com.   Bill Hurst has been selected as a “Best Lawyer” in Indiana for over 20 years.

Forklift accidents statistics indicate forklifts present a significant hazard to people occupying the same work space.  Forklift injuries can be severe or fatal as forklifts are heavy and powerful vehicles.  As reported by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health forklifts strike pedestrians everyday, and result in hundreds of deaths, and, more than 90,000 injuries annually in the United States.  The NIOSH report states that approximately every three days, someone in the United States is killed in a forklift accident.  The cost for medical and lost work production incurred because of forklift accidents is estimated to be greater than $100 million annually.  http://ohsonline.com/articles/2007/02/your-forklift-safety-zone.aspx.  While most cases involve workers compensation, there have been huge lawsuit awards made for forklift accidents caused by co-workers who are employed by third parties

Because of the multiples of injuries and high expenses involved, there are numerous technologies being developed today to address safety issues for industrial applications.  For example, there are laser scanners that mount on the front and back of forklifts, providing warning and safety zone areas, microwave motion sensors that detect vehicular traffic in a sensing area, audible and visual alarms that have been developed for forklifts to warn of movement, as well as infra-red communications technology which create invisible 30 foot beam that sweeps around the forklift truck whenever it’s operational.  This new technology is discussed in the February 2007 issue of Occupational Health and Safety Report.  OSHA reports that there are over one million lift-truck in operation daily.  Accidents occur when lift trucks are inadvertently driven off loading docks, fall between docks, and workers are struck by moving lift trucks.

Most incidents involve property damage including damage to sprinkler heads, rackings, pipes, walls and machinery, most worker injuries as well as property damage can be attributed to the lack of safe operating procedures and lack of safety-rule enforcement.  OSHA standards require an operator to be over the age of 18, and properly trained and certified.  This is partially due to allowing inexperienced operators to be in the workplace.  The United States Department of Labor through OSHA has issued a number of standards and directives in an attempt to minimize these accident statistics. http://www.OSHA.gov/SLTC/poweredindustrialtrucks/index.html

In Indiana, the Chamber of Commerce, periodically has training conferences at the Indiana Chamber of Commerce Center in Indianapolis (last being May 12, 2011) for safety training in the workplace.  If you are interested in offering forklift safety training/information, you can obtain safety training manuals, DVDs, videos, posters and training kits at http://www.OSHA-safety-training.net/.

If you’ve been injured in an industrial or construction site accident involving a forklift and you would like to have a free consultation with an experienced attorney, contact William W. Hurst.

Cervical Spine Injuries and Whiplash Injuries

Neck or cervical injuries often occur when a car is struck from the rear.  The acceleration caused by the collision of the vehicle throws the occupant’s head forward with up to 10 or more times the force of gravity.  The sheer and bending forces on the spine often result in neck injuries, nerve root injuries, and even more serious injuries including herniated discs.

These “whiplash” type injuries often referred to as “soft tissue” injuries generally do not require surgical repair and for the most part there is recovery within 6 to 12 months of the accident.  Despite this, there is a substantial portion of the population involved in these rear end collisions that end up having permanent issues with their cervical spine.  Such injuries leave the victim more susceptible to future re-injury and sometimes accelerate arthritic disease of the spine.  Physicians who specialize in treating spinal injuries often opine that there are microscopic tears in the soft tissues surrounding the cervical spine caused by the accelerated/deceleration forces develop microscopic scar tissue as they heal.  This scar tissue can be a contributing factor to long term problems resulting from these accidental injuries.

It is estimated that about 3 million people are injured each year in rear end collisions.  There are a number of studies that have determined that the chief mechanism in whiplash injuries is the deferential motion of the head and neck as the car moves forward causing sheer forces that damage the spine and surrounding tissue http://www.srisd.com/cervicalspineinjuries.html

Rear end collisions are increasing as cell phone usage and other driver distraction features in automobiles are causing driver’s to keep improper lookout.http://www.ehow.com/about_6360956_rear-end-dash-accident-injuries.html

Neck injuries, when more severe may be associated with headaches, dizziness, burning and tingling in the neck which may radiate into the shoulder.  Some people even experience cognitive/psychological conditions such as memory loss, concentration impairment and sleep disturbances as well as fatigue or depression.  “Whiplash” injuries typical treatment will include pain medications, and anti-inflammatory drugs.  For more severe injuries there may be home exercise for range of motion and improvement, as well as physical therapy which could include a heat application, ultrasound and massage.

For those people who do not recover within 6 to 12 months after the collision, the future is uncertain.  Medicine to date does not have a cure, or a clear explanation why some people do better than others.  When pain does become chronic or persistent, the injured person may then be faced with a necessity of treatment at a pain clinic to learn to deal with long term pain.  People who suffer “chronic” pain often suffer side effects including severe depression, sleep interruption, and fatigue.  For general discussion of pain and treatment see

http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/pain/blaustein_pain_center/

If you have suffered spinal injuries in a rear end collision you may discuss your case for free with an attorney who has represented hundreds/thousands of people injured in rear end collisions William W. Hurst.

There are over four (4) million motorcycles registered in the United States. Motorcycle fatalities represent approximately five percent (5%) of all highway fatalities each year. Yet, motorcycles represent just 2 percent of all registered motor vehicles. Almost eighty percent (80%) of all motorcycle crashes result in injury or death, a comparable figure for motor vehicles is 20%.

In 2006, almost 5,000 people were killed while riding motorcycles.  A study contacted by the University of Southern California with funds from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigated 900 motorcycle accidents in the L.A. area.  They also analyzed 3,600 motorcycle accidents involved collisions with another vehicle, which was usually a passenger vehicle.  Only 1/4 of these motorcycle accidents were single-vehicle accidents involving the motorcyle colliding with the roadway or some fixed object.  Vehicular failure accounted for less than 3% of the motorcycle accidents.  Road way defects were the cause of the accident in about 2% of the accidents, and animal involvement was 1%.  In 2/3 of the vehicular accidents, the driver of the other vehicle violated the motorcycle’ right of way and caused the accident.  The failure of motorists to detect and recognize motorcycles in traffic is the dominating cause of motorcycle accidents.  The actual deliberate, hostile action of the motorist against the motorcycle is a rare accident cause.

Intersections are the most likely place for motorcycle accidents and most accidents occur during short trips associated with shopping, errands or going to see friends, and are likely to happen in a very short time close to the trip’s origin.  the medium pre-cashed speed of the motorcycle was 29.8 mph.  Motorcycle riders between the ages of 16 and 24 are significantly overrepresented in the accidents, and the riders between the ages of 30 to 50 are significantly less.  The motorcycle riders who have previous traffic violations and accidents predominate in the accident data.  More than 1/2 of  the accidents involve motorcycle riders with less than five months experience.  Almost 1/2 the fatal accidents show alcohol involvement.  The typical motorcycle accident only allows the motorcyclist less than 2 seconds to engage in collision avoidance.

Half of the injuries are to the ankle, lower leg, knee and upper thigh area.  Groin injuries were sustained by the motorcyclist at least 13% of the accident, which is typical in the frontal impact at a higher than average speed.  Injury severity increases with speed, alcohol involvement, and motorcycle size.  Approximately 50% of the motorcycle riders in traffic were using safety helmets, but only 40% of the riders were wearing helmets at the time of the accident.  The most deadly injuries to motorcyclist were injuries to the chest and head.  The use of a safety helmet is the single critical factor in prevention and/or reduction of head injuries.  Helmeted riders and passengers showed significantly lower head and neck injuries for all type of injuries and at all levels of injury severity.  It is noteworthy that less than 10% of  the motorcycle riders involved in the se accidents had insurance of any kind to provide medical care or replace their property.  http://www.motorcycle-accidents.com/

Watch this accident happen in the blink of an eye:  Motorcycle Crash: Rider Hit from Behind

Compared with other operators, it is clear that motorcyclists are at a much greater risk for injury.  Statistically over the last 10 years the number of motorcycle accidents has escalated throughout the country.  According to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, it shows that since 1997 motorcycle rider fatalities have increased by 89% from 2,116 in 2000 to 4,008 in 2004.

In 2000, there were 113 fatal motorcycle crashed in Indiana, 20% of which were helmeted and 39% which involved alcohol at the time of the crash.  There were 5,000 fatal motorcycle crashes in Indiana in 2006, but there are currently no recent statistics.  It would appear from the statistics that the mostl likely person to die in an Indiana motorcycle accident is a 40 to 50 year old man riding alone on the weekends.  By the very nature of the motorcycles, they are much less safe than passenger vehicles.  There is no safety cage as there is in an automobile.  A rider and a passenger is likely to come into direct contact with obstacles in the road.  Only 2 to 4% of all drivers on the road are motorcycles.  While this is a relatively small percentage motorcycle accidents make up 9 to 11% of the total fatalities on the road every year.  Recently in March, in Parkersburg Indiana, on US 231,  a collision occured between a dirt bike and a motorcycle, claiming the life of a 27 year old Lafayette man.  A motorcycle operator was  killed on July 15, 2010 on County Road 700 when he lost control of his bike and crashed.  The motorcyclist was air-lifted to the hospital in Fort Wayne, but he died in route.  A Wabash County sheriff indicated that the bike had left the road and flipped several times.  In August of 2009, in Johnson County, a Greenwood man was killed in a motorcycle accident.  the investigation showed that the motorcyclist had been traveling West on Travis Road when it left the roadway and struck a pole.  The cause of the crash was not immediately determined.  Paramedics determined that the motorcyclist was dead at the scene, which was only a short distance from the victim’s home.  He was not wearing a safety helmet, and received apparent head injuries.

www.wthr.com/story/greenwood/man/killed/in/motorcycle/accident

In 2009, a West Harrison man died after his motorcycle crashed east of New Trenton, Indiana.  A police officer noticed the motorcycle on New Trenton road and started to turn around to pull over the motorcycle, only to find the bike crashed on the side of the road a short distance away.  The trooper noted that the bike was going fast for the curve in the road, and the motorcyclist had veered off the road and hit a tree.  He was pronounced dead at the scene.  The driver was wearing a helmet at the time of the crash.  www.lwt.com/news . While this list of accidents with serious injuries is endless,  a very recent one typifies the seriousness of the injuries resulting when a vehicle strikes a motorcyclist in a head on collision.  On Jne 17, 2010 a Rennselaer couple was involved in a head on collision with a pick up truck near Dumont, Indiana.  The wife of the couple was pronounced dead at the Methodist Hospital in Merriville.  The cause of the injury was multiple blunt-force trauma.  Her husband was 56 years old from Rensselaer and was pronounced dead at the scene according to the Jasper County Sheriff’s department.  The couple was driving a 2001 Honda motorcycle westbound on County Road 1200 North near east county road 900 west when a grey 2007 Ford Ranger drive

If you have been injured in a motorcycle accident and are seeking an experienced, top rated lawyer contact Bill Hurst today for a free consultation and case evaluation.For tips on motorcycle safety, click on this link.

If you are interested in motor vehicle recalls, child safety seat recalls, tire recalls, or the NHTSA recall notification system, or if you want to report car, truck, or vehicle equipment that you feel has safety defects, click on the following links:The NHTSA Recall List or Office of Defects Investigation – Safety Recalls If you have been injured as a result of an equipment or product failure and need advice, see our wesite at http://www.billhurst.com

There’s growing support in the United States for statutory bans prohibiting hand-held cell phone usage while driving. There have been several recent scientific studies supporting not only baning hand-held cell phones but also wireless technology used in vehicles that are hands free. The Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) currently advises all drivers not to use cell phones or other electronic devices while driving, regardless of current law. U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood also has stated that he believes motorists are distracted by any use of mobile devices while driving including hands-free devices. As of December 2010, there are no states that have a ban on ALL cell phone use while driving. There are several laws banning hand-held cell phone use, and in particular texting for driver groups, primarily teens. Since 2009, twelve states have banned texting while driving, and of the other states, hand-held cell phone use is currently banned in eight states but not in Indiana. For more information on cell phone use laws in various states visit www.ghsa.net.

In 2003 the University of Utah psychologists published a study showing that motorists who talked on hand-held or hands-free cell phones are as impaired as drunk drivers [National Highway Safety Traffic Administration (NHTSA)]. Both hands-free and hand -held cell phone conversations cause significant cognitive distraction to impair drivers’ performance resulting in crashes. In 2011, the National Safety Council published a paper called “Understanding the Distracted Brain…While Driving using Hand -Free Cell Phones is Risky Behavior”. According to this publication, drivers using hands-free mobile devices while driving have a tendency to look up but not see objects. WWW.nsc.org. It is known that the hands-free technology available in automobiles today give people a false sense of safety while they are talking. Ofter you will hear people complaining of people talking on cell phones, but seldom do you read or hear about the distraction cause by simply using hands-Free devices while talking to somebody in your vehicle. This is likely to change in the next few years.

Click link below for a discussion of a study that people who talk on cell phones while driving are as impaired as drunk drivers. Some studies have suggested as many as 2,600 people are killed each year from people driving while talking on a cell phone. A recent poll revealed that 2/3rds of Americans would support a ban on using cell phones while driving. For an interesting article please click on the links below:

Study: Talking on Cell Phone as Dangerous as Driving Drunk

Cell Phone Statistics

If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident and you need an experienced personal injury lawyer, contact Bill Hurst today for a free consultation and case evaluation

Seat belts increase your chances of surviving an accident by 45%, says the NHTSA. However, in spite of this and many other reasons to wear your seat belt, 55% of the 31,963 vehicle occupants that died in car accidents in 2004 chose not to wear one. If you have been injured in an automobile or truck accident, contact Bill Hurst today for a free consultation and case evaluation.

For an interesting article that references the NHTSA study, click on the following link: Reasons to Wear Your Seat Belt

A recent study shows that 1000 Americans per day are treated in ER as a result of dog bites. In 2007 there were 33 fatal dog attacks in the USA. Most of the victims are children, half of whom are bitten in the face. There are almost 800,000 bites per year – one out of every six-are serious enough to require medical attention. In 2007 in Indiana, one person was killed.In 2008 one person was killed in Indiana. The number of fatal dog attacks in the USA HAS BEEN GOING UP. This website http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/dog-bites/biteprevention.html contains verifiable information about Americans who are killed by dogs including the name date and place, type of dog involved. If you have suffered a dog bit injury, contact WWH for an article on protecting children against dog bites. Contact Bill Hurst today for a free consultation and case evaluation

Copyright © 2011 William W. Hurst. All rights reserved.
Bill Hurst is a partner in Mitchell, Hurst, Dick & McNelis, LLC.
Use of the web site does not create an attorney-client relationship.